Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $46.41 vs $376.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-12900K - $0.3 vs $2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 53 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 21% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1820 - 188 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
155
82.4468085106383%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349399 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
14.92537313432836%
Price, $
$376.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $376.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
18.740458015267176%
Multi-Core
825
5.341534477177079%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |