Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4765T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4765T is 272 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Core i3-3220 - 152 vs 133 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3220 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $79.0 vs $498.95
- Up to 82% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-4765T - $0.59 vs $3.28 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.28/FPS
17.98780487804878%
Price, $
$498.95
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348969 minutes ago
Buy for $79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348967 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
57.56578947368421%
Multi-Core
1085
37.272414977670906%
Intel Core i7-4765T | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |