Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10850K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10850K is 2521 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i9-10850K - $199.88 vs $286.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10850K
- Performs up to 96% better in Diablo IV than Core i7-4820K - 225 vs 115 FPS
- Up to 27% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i7-4820K - $1.27 vs $1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
115
51.11111111111111%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
72.98850574712644%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358281 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$286
69%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $286 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
37.81609195402299%
Multi-Core
2440
26.824978012313107%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-10850K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |