Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $199.88 vs $240.0
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 24% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4820K - 146 vs 118 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4820K - $1.64 vs $1.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
118
80.82191780821918%
Value, $/FPS
$1.69/FPS
97.0414201183432%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358267 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
146
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
83%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
30.308613542146478%
Multi-Core
2440
26.605604623269002%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |