Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4820K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 3313 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4820K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4820K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $199.88 vs $285.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 77% better in Starfield than Core i7-4820K - 83 vs 47 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-4820K - $3.43 vs $4.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Core i7-4820K - 105 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4820K - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4820K doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
47
56.62650602409639%
Value, $/FPS
$4.25/FPS
80.70588235294119%
Price, $
$199.88
100%
Buy for $199.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358289 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
83
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$285
70%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $285 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358290 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
658
22.62723521320495%
Multi-Core
2440
15.986372272816615%
Intel Core i7-4820K | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |