Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 577 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1820 - 130 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $46.41 vs $150.0
- Up to 65% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-6700 - $0.4 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
130
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
34.78260869565218%
Price, $
$150
30%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361932 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
117
90%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361931 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
37.97370456303171%
Multi-Core
825
19.92753623188406%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |