Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 62 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 172 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $39.95 vs $150.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6700 - $0.26 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
29.88505747126437%
Price, $
$150
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361935 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
89.53488372093024%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
44.93426140757927%
Multi-Core
992
23.96135265700483%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |