Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 1007 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G4900 - 172 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $50.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6700 - $0.32 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
36.7816091954023%
Price, $
$150
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361929 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
155
90.11627906976744%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$50
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $50 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361928 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
47.641144624903326%
Multi-Core
1051
25.38647342995169%
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |