Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 981 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 13% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8300 - 111 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $47.98 vs $150.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-6700 - $0.49 vs $1.35 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
111
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.35/FPS
36.29629629629629%
Price, $
$150
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361924 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
98
88.28828828828829%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361923 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |