Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6700T outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1043 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than FX-8350 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than FX-8350 - $99.9 vs $185.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Elden Ring than FX-8350 - $0.84 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348905 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
111
93.27731092436974%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
50.29940119760479%
Price, $
$185
54%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348903 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |