Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6850K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1750 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6850K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6850K - 442 vs 345 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-6850K - $113.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 26% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-6850K - $0.26 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6850K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
345
78.05429864253394%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
74.28571428571429%
Price, $
$120
94%
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354093 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
442
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354092 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Single-Core
1268
64.66088730239674%
Multi-Core
5821
76.51156677181913%
Intel Core i7-6850K | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Broadwell E | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |