Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 217 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Valheim than Celeron G3930 - 199 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $98.02 vs $145.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6900K - $0.51 vs $0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
69.86301369863014%
Price, $
$145
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360809 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
191
95.97989949748744%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360808 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
48.56230031948881%
Multi-Core
1043
14.652992413599325%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |