Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 217 days older than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 1% better in God of War than Core i3-7100T - 172 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $66.82 vs $145.0
- Up to 54% better value when playing God of War than Core i7-6900K - $0.39 vs $0.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
46.42857142857143%
Price, $
$145
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361453 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
170
98.83720930232558%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361454 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
89.1373801916933%
Multi-Core
2260
31.750491711154822%
Intel Core i7-6900K | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |