Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600 - $66.82 vs $110.99
- Up to 19% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 5 3600 - $1.55 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 35% better in Immortals of Aveum than Core i3-7100T - 58 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
43
74.13793103448276%
Value, $/FPS
$1.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349033 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
58
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
81.15183246073299%
Price, $
$110.99
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349033 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
69.88102692548529%
Multi-Core
2260
32.82975014526438%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |