Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - $66.82 vs $113.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Valheim than Core i5-11400F - $0.34 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-11400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Core i3-7100T - 210 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
197
93.80952380952381%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$66.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $66.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
210
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
62.96296296296296%
Price, $
$113
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349039 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1116
56.90973992860785%
Multi-Core
2260
29.7055730809674%
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |