Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2409 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-6950X - 590 vs 530 FPS
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $591.89 vs $651.07
- Up to 19% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-6950X - $1.0 vs $1.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6950X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280361 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
590
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$591.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $591.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |