Buy on Amazon
$651.07
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1723
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1723
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6950X is 436 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $651.07 vs $788.88
- Up to 17% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $3.66 vs $4.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 32 vs 20 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-6950X
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.66/FPS
100%
Price, $
$651.07
100%
Value Winner
Intel BX80671I76950X Boxed Core i7-6950X Processor Extreme Edition (25M Cache, up to 3.50 GHz) 3.0 10
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280360 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.43/FPS
82%
Price, $
$788.88
82%
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-6950X
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6950X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Broadwell-E | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 10 | Cores | 16 |
| 20 | Threads | 32 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
