Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $167.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 21% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-10700F - $2.88 vs $3.65 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Core i7-7700 - 62 vs 58 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 16 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
58
93.54838709677419%
Value, $/FPS
$2.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $167 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349338 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
62
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.65/FPS
78.9041095890411%
Price, $
$225.99
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1389
86.16625310173698%
Multi-Core
4460
61.67888258885355%
Intel Core i7-7700 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |