Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-7700 vs Core i9-11900K

Core i7-7700 vs Core i9-11900K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Core i7-7700

3.6 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W

Buy for $167 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349340 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K

3.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W

Buy for $265 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349340 minutes ago

Intel Core i7-7700

3.6 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W

Buy for $167 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349340 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K

3.5 GHz | 8-core

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W

Buy for $265 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349340 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-7700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-7700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-7700.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700

  • Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $167.0 vs $265.0
  • Up to 29% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-11900K - $0.7 vs $0.98 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K

  • Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-7700 - 271 vs 238 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700 - 16 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Battlefield V.

Battlefield V

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Core i7-7700

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


FPS

238

87.82287822878229%

Value, $/FPS

$0.7/FPS

100%

Price, $

$167

100%

Value Winner

Intel Core i7-7700 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.2 GHz LGA 1151 100/200 Series 65W

Buy for $167 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349340 minutes ago

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

271

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.98/FPS

71.42857142857143%

Price, $

$265

63%

FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-11900K Desktop Processor 8 Cores up to 5.3 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel 500 Series & Select 400 Chipset) 125W

Buy for $265 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349340 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Core i7-7700

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo
Core i7-7700

Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017


Single-Core

1389

58.582876423450024%

Multi-Core

4460

40.738034344172455%

Intel Core i9-11900K Logo
Core i9-11900K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

2371

100%

Multi-Core

10948

100%

Intel Core i7-7700 Logo

Intel Core i7-7700

vs
Intel Core i9-11900K Logo

Intel Core i9-11900K

Jan 3rd, 2017Release Date
Mar 16th, 2021
Core i7CollectionCore i9
Kaby LakeCodenameRocket Lake
Intel Socket 1151SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
8
8Threads
16
3.6 GHz
Base Clock Speed3.5 GHz
4.2 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.3 GHz
65 W
TDP125 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
36.0x
Multiplier35.0x
HD 630Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750
NoOverclockable
Yes

Builds Using Core i7-7700 or Core i9-11900K

Battlefield V, 1920 x 1080, Ultra

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.