Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1129 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1820 - 179 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - $46.41 vs $252.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7700K - $0.31 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 53 vs 91 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
21.98581560283688%
Price, $
$252
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $252 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361983 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
152
84.91620111731844%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361982 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
31.253978357733924%
Multi-Core
825
16.16062683643487%
Intel Core i7-7700K | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
91 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |