Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 741 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 8% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 3400G - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $132.0 vs $375.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-7820X - $0.79 vs $2.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.07/FPS
38.16425120772947%
Price, $
$375
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
168
92.81767955801105%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$132
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
79.94330262225373%
Multi-Core
3619
46.10778443113773%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |