Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 561 days older than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i7-7820X - $112.0 vs $375.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-7820X - $0.93 vs $3.1 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $375 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348796 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
97.66123316796597%
Multi-Core
4834
61.58746337113008%
Intel Core i7-7820X | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |