Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7600 is 2674 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i5-7600 - $48.0 vs $99.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-7600 - $0.32 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-860 - 174 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
151
86.7816091954023%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361536 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
174
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
56.14035087719299%
Price, $
$99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361537 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i5-7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |