Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 3514 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $48.0 vs $389.88
- Up to 88% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-9700F - $0.25 vs $2.05 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i7-860 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
189
99.47368421052632%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362495 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.05/FPS
12.195121951219514%
Price, $
$389.88
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $389.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
28.79276952872821%
Multi-Core
1463
23.385549872122763%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |