Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 2915 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-7940X - $48.0 vs $425.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-7940X - $0.25 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Core i7-860 - 200 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 28 vs 8 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362607 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
11.792452830188678%
Price, $
$425
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $425 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362608 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
32.55474452554745%
Multi-Core
1463
14.743525143605765%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |