Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 4440 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $48.0 vs $350.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-12900KF - $0.29 vs $1.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 27% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-860 - 212 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 24 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
167
78.77358490566037%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362309 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.66/FPS
17.46987951807229%
Price, $
$350.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $350.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362309 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
446
17.545239968528715%
Multi-Core
1463
9.831328539748672%
Intel Core i7-860 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |