Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F and the cheaper Core i3-10100 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-10100 - 124 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $99.03 vs $244.77
- Up to 59% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900F - $0.81 vs $1.97 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
41.11675126903553%
Price, $
$244.77
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
98.38709677419355%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1426
85.0835322195704%
Multi-Core
4215
50.023736055067644%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |