Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-6100 - 138 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $100.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900F - $0.75 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
42.3728813559322%
Price, $
$244.77
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
133
96.37681159420289%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
71.24105011933175%
Multi-Core
2336
27.723712319012577%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |