Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11500 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11500 is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11500 - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10900F - 177 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $218.99 vs $244.77
- Up to 13% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-10900F - $1.24 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
96.61016949152543%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
86.71328671328672%
Price, $
$244.77
89%
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349397 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$218.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $218.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349397 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |