Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-3450S - 138 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $95.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 58% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900F - $0.74 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
41.80790960451977%
Price, $
$244.77
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349334 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
128
92.7536231884058%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
34.84486873508354%
Multi-Core
1681
19.95015428435794%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-3450S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |