Buy on Amazon
$244.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i5-750 - 152 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-750 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $75.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 61% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-10900F - $0.62 vs $1.61 per FPS
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.61/FPS
38.50931677018633%
Price, $
$244.77
30%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349346 minutes ago
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
121
79.60526315789474%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-750 Quad-Core Desktop Processor (BX80605I5750) 8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, LGA1156
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-750
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
25.477326968973745%
Multi-Core
1200
14.241633040588656%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
