Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 478 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 10% better in War Thunder than Core i5-9400F - 196 vs 178 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $112.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 50% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900F - $0.63 vs $1.25 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
50.4%
Price, $
$244.77
45%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349093 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
178
90.81632653061224%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349094 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
82.21957040572792%
Multi-Core
4834
57.37004509850463%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |