Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3111 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-2700K - 138 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2700K - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $82.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 64% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10900F - $0.64 vs $1.77 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.77/FPS
36.15819209039548%
Price, $
$244.77
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349229 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
129
93.47826086956522%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Single-Core
664
39.618138424821005%
Multi-Core
2264
26.86921433657726%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |