Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 19% better in War Thunder than Core i7-4770S - 196 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770S - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770S
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $119.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 42% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900F - $0.72 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
57.599999999999994%
Price, $
$244.77
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349093 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
165
84.18367346938776%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349094 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1149
68.55608591885442%
Multi-Core
3579
42.47567054355566%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-4770S |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |