Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1430 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Core i7-6950X - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i7-6950X - $244.77 vs $651.07
- Up to 64% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-6950X - $1.19 vs $3.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6950X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349039 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
199
97.07317073170731%
Value, $/FPS
$3.27/FPS
36.391437308868504%
Price, $
$651.07
37%
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349040 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |