Buy on Amazon
$244.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 4182 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 21% better in Battlefield V than Core i7-920 - 249 vs 206 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $90.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-10900F - $0.44 vs $0.98 per FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
249
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
44.89795918367347%
Price, $
$244.77
36%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349090 minutes ago
Core i7-920
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
206
82.73092369477911%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7 Processor i7-920 2.66GHz 8 MB LGA1366 CPU BX80601920
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349090 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7-920
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Single-Core
415
24.761336515513126%
Multi-Core
1434
17.01875148350344%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-920 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Bloomfield |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
