Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-11900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-11900F is 320 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-11900F - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10900F - 164 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $240.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 4% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-10900F - $1.46 vs $1.52 per FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
161
98.17073170731707%
Value, $/FPS
$1.52/FPS
96.05263157894737%
Price, $
$244.77
98%
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350201 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$240
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1676
77.1994472593275%
Multi-Core
8426
91.87656744084615%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |