Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 3887 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-750.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 49% better in Starfield than Core i5-750 - 64 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-750 - 20 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-750 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-750
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $75.0 vs $490.0
- Up to 77% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-10900K - $1.74 vs $7.66 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.66/FPS
22.715404699738905%
Price, $
$490
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $490 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349450 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
FPS
43
67.1875%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, $
$75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Single-Core
427
24.41395082904517%
Multi-Core
1200
13.096147549929062%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i5-750 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |