Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2479 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 25% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G3258 - 193 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $51.36 vs $270.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900 - $0.33 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
193
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
23.571428571428573%
Price, $
$270
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361930 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
155
80.31088082901555%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.36
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361929 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Single-Core
613
28.779342723004696%
Multi-Core
1074
12.18239564428312%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Pentium |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |