Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 19% better in Minecraft than Core i3-4150 - 794 vs 666 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $48.0 vs $270.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-11900 - $0.07 vs $0.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
794
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
20.58823529411765%
Price, $
$270
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362070 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
666
83.87909319899244%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362071 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
48.87323943661972%
Multi-Core
2047
23.219147005444647%
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |