Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 28% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8150 - 193 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $64.03 vs $270.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900 - $0.42 vs $1.4 per FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362057 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
151
78.23834196891191%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.03
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |