Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1435 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1400.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Ryzen 5 1400 - 560 vs 519 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1400 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1400
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $42.88 vs $240.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-11900F - $0.08 vs $0.43 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
18.6046511627907%
Price, $
$240
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361990 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
519
92.67857142857143%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $42.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 361991 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
949
43.712574850299404%
Multi-Core
3098
33.78039472249482%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |