Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G3900 - 194 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $39.95 vs $240.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-11900F - $0.26 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.24/FPS
20.967741935483872%
Price, $
$240
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362005 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
154
79.38144329896907%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362005 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
26.761860893597422%
Multi-Core
992
10.81670483044379%
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |