Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 56% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-4300 - 92 vs 59 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $48.02 vs $240.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-11900F - $0.81 vs $2.61 per FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.61/FPS
31.03448275862069%
Price, $
$240
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362004 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
59
64.13043478260869%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |