Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450S.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 18% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-3450S - 132 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450S - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450S
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $95.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-11900K - $0.85 vs $2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
42.28855721393035%
Price, $
$265
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
112
84.84848484848484%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
100%
Price, $
$95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349334 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
584
24.63095740194011%
Multi-Core
1681
15.354402630617464%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-3450S |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |