Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2084 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 32% better in Starfield than Core i5-6600 - 74 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $74.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 63% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-11900K - $1.32 vs $3.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
74
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.58/FPS
36.87150837988827%
Price, $
$265
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349334 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
56
75.67567567567568%
Value, $/FPS
$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1286
54.2387178405736%
Multi-Core
3552
32.444282060650345%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |