Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-6700T - 209 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $99.9 vs $265.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-11900K - $0.55 vs $1.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
43.30708661417323%
Price, $
$265
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348552 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
182
87.08133971291866%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348552 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
49.894559257697175%
Multi-Core
3566
32.57215929850201%
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |