Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 1519 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 12% better in Borderlands 3 than FX-6350 - 220 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 20 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $100.0 vs $400.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i9-7900X - $0.51 vs $1.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 125 vs 140 Watts
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.82/FPS
28.021978021978022%
Price, $
$400
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349822 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
197
89.54545454545455%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349821 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 6 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |