Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 1359 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-7900X - 128 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i9-7900X - $113.0 vs $400.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-7900X - $0.88 vs $3.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 65 vs 140 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
122
95.3125%
Value, $/FPS
$3.28/FPS
26.82926829268293%
Price, $
$400
28%
Buy for $400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348734 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$113
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $113 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348734 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7900X | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake-E/EP | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |