Buy on Amazon
$550
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $120
Availability
MSRP in USD: $120
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 553 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 2% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-9900X - 147 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $150.0 vs $550.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-9900X - $1.02 vs $3.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
144
97.95918367346938%
Value, $/FPS
$3.82/FPS
26.701570680628272%
Price, $
$550
27%
Intel Core i9-9900X X-Series Processor 10 Cores up to 4.4GHz Turbo Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W Processors (999AC5)
Buy for $550 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349038 minutes ago
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X 4-Core, 8-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Stealth Cooler
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349037 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-9900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
